Agree with a arguments put brazen here? Disagree? Have your contend in a comments territory below.
But does that indispensably finish a argument? Is a sum series of grand slams won the usually approach to decider that of these dual legends of a competition is a greatest?
Let’s start by looking during a slams won by any player. When assessing their vital wins, Federer clearly benefitted from carrying a few years before a appearance of a ‘Big Four’ as we know it. Between 2003 and 2007, Federer won 8 grand slams though violence any of Nadal, Novak Djokovic or Andy Murray along a way, and combined dual some-more in 2009 though personification any of those three. A discerning peek during Federer’s final opponents in those majors shows the likes of Mark Philippoussis, Fernando Gonzalez and Marcos Bagdahtis, who are not accurately tennis heavyweights.
Nadal by contrariety has had to kick one of a ‘Big Four’ in all though dual of his 15 grand slam wins, and in one of a ones when he didn’t his final competition was Stan Wawrinka, a three-time impact champion.